Volume 35, Number 2
Fall, 2008


HOME

DEPARTMENTS

  • Letter from the Chair
  • New Admins of Justice
  • Conference Wrap-ups
  • 2008 Evidence Summit
  • Honors & Achievements
  • FEATURES

  • American Law in China
  • Mediator Credentialing
  • Helping the Most Vulnerable (CJA Outreach)
  • Improve Efficiency with OCA
  • BUSINESS

  • Leadership Nominations
  • District Judges Meeting
  • Contributions in Honor
  • Contributions in Memory
  • In Memoriam
  • Mark Your Calendar! Upcoming Events

  • About In Chambers

    PRINTABLE Version (PDF)

    Past Issues of In Chambers

     

    Evidence Summit
    Ables & Livingston
    Hosts of the 2008 Evidence Summit, Hon. Stephen Ables
    and Hon. Lora Livingston

    If you need evidence of a winning judicial education conference, the 2008 Evidence Summit held August 3-5 at the Sheraton Austin Hotel should satisfy any doubts. The first of its kind, the Texas Center for the Judiciary brought together Texas judges and eight Texas law schools to compete for the title of Evidence Summit Champions.

    Hosting the Summit were two of the most amazing and entertaining legal minds on the Texas bench today, Honorable Lora Livingston of the 261st District Court, and Honorable Stephen Ables, Presiding Judge of the 6th Judicial Region, 216th District Court.

    This gathering was a first for judges and law schools, and based on the highly favorable responses (see next column), a worthy program to continue throughout the years.

    How did the Summit work?
    Each law school had a "host" team comprised of the law school dean (or his/her designate), an evidence professor, and ajudgealumna/alumnus. A distinguished judicial panel also served as a host team. Each panel hosted one hour of Evidence Jeopardy on a high-tech game board with remote transponders at each team's table. Selected categories included Relevancy, Hearsay, Hearsay Exceptions, Contents of Writings, Expert Witnesses, Non-expert Witnesses, Authentication and Identification, and Objections. Each panel administered their own 25 questions from the Jeopardy board.

    Competition was Fierce!
    The judicial teams consisted of all conference attendees, randomly assigned to a team. Lively discussion and debate ruled the day-an-a-half summit, and our illustrious hosts made certain no harm or foul came to anyone.

    Announcing the 2008 Evidence Summit Champions:

    First Place: Team 7

    L to R: Donald Metcalfe, Ricardo Herrera, Carlos Cortez,
    Ben Childers, Suzanne Stovall, Virgil Vahlenkamp
    (Not pictured: Diane Henson, W.G. Woods)

    Second Place:  Team 5

    L to R: Kenneth DeHart, Don Burgess, Mollee Westfall,
    Robert Moore (Not pictured: John Nelms, Carter Tarrance)

    Third Place:  Team 2

    Woody Densen, Patrice McDonald, Buddie Hahn, Eric Shepperd,
    Mike Herrera, Robin Malone Darr, Stephen Yelenosky
    (Not pictured: Mary Anne Bramblett, Lee Duggan)

    Congratulations on Team 7's victory!

    If you missed this year’s Summit, fear not. Next year's Evidence Summit will be even better, chocked full of new and exciting challenges. Enrollment will be limited, so watch for information in early 2009 on the next Evidence Summit!

     

    What participants said:

    While I left early because of the inclement weather on the way to Houston, I want ya'll to know that this was one of the very best CLEs I've ever attended. I've been licensed for 29 years and in the past I have been a member of the College of the State Bar. I really know what I'm saying. Ya'll just did an amazing job.Evidence Summit Bridgwater

    I think the table discussions among the different levels, tenures, and ages of the judges were absolutely great to see; and to connect it with the law school professors and deans was brilliant. Thanks so much for letting me be part of the faculty and the fellowship.

    Judge Roger Bridgwater
    178th District Court
    Houston, Texas


    Evidence is the "tool" of our trade. For trial judges, it is the most important area to master. I have been waiting a long time for a seminar devoted to this topic.

    Evidence Summit Attendees
    It was more fun and interesting than any seminar I have attended in a long time. -- Loved it, would recommend it to anyone.

    Evidence Summit AttendeesI attended because I felt [this conference] could help inmy evidence rulings. It exceeded my expectations.


    You hit a home run on this program. Team concept [is] excellent.

    Fun and educational and good exchanges of opinions within the teams.

    Major strengths of the 2008 Evidence Summit: Covered practical scenarios, was entertaining, and excellent staff!

    Major strengths of the 2008 Evidence Summit: Ability to really meet and interact with judges we didn't know before. Helpful to listen to those other judges' rationale for their decisions.

    I came to this conference because I thought the format sounded interesting. The days flew by and I thoroughly enjoyed this seminar.



    Much better than anticipated! Having to vote under pressure is the same as being in court.


    Do it again!

    Evidence Summit Attendees

    Great interaction with the large group and very meaningful discussions at our tables.