![]() |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
If you need evidence of a winning judicial education conference, the 2008 Evidence Summit held August 3-5 at the Sheraton Austin Hotel should satisfy any doubts. The first of its kind, the Texas Center for the Judiciary brought together Texas judges and eight Texas law schools to compete for the title of Evidence Summit Champions. Hosting the Summit were two of the most amazing and entertaining legal minds on the Texas bench today, Honorable Lora Livingston of the 261st District Court, and Honorable Stephen Ables, Presiding Judge of the 6th Judicial Region, 216th District Court. This gathering was a first for judges and law schools, and based on the highly favorable responses (see next column), a worthy program to continue throughout the years. How did the Summit work? Competition was Fierce! Announcing the 2008 Evidence Summit Champions: First Place: Team 7 Second Place: Team 5 Third Place: Team 2 Congratulations on Team 7's victory! If you missed this year’s Summit, fear not. Next year's Evidence Summit will be even better, chocked full of new and exciting challenges. Enrollment will be limited, so watch for information in early 2009 on the next Evidence Summit!
|
What participants said: While I left early because of the inclement weather on the way to Houston, I want ya'll to know that this was one of the very best CLEs I've ever attended. I've been licensed for 29 years and in the past I have been a member of the College of the State Bar. I really know what I'm saying. Ya'll just did an amazing job. Evidence is the "tool" of our trade. For trial judges, it is the most important area to master. I have been waiting a long time for a seminar devoted to this topic.
Major strengths of the 2008 Evidence Summit: Covered practical scenarios, was entertaining, and excellent staff!
Major strengths of the 2008 Evidence Summit: Ability to really meet and interact with judges we didn't know before. Helpful to listen to those other judges' rationale for their decisions. I came to this conference because I thought the format sounded interesting. The days flew by and I thoroughly enjoyed this seminar.
Great interaction with the large group and very meaningful discussions at our tables. |
||









I attended because I felt [this conference] could help inmy evidence rulings. It exceeded my expectations.
You hit a home run on this program. Team concept [is] excellent.


